Grateful Hands

I, Mark Robbins, took a polygraph test

Mayor Leighton won’t.

NOTE TO READER: If anybody finds any statements or assertions to be materially untrue, I ask that they use contact E mail address at the bottom of the page as a tool for notification. If necessary corrections and/or retractions will be made. Thank you for your consideration to this matter.

We aren’t in a court of law (but rather in the court of public opinion).   Who would you believe?

• The person who voluntarily took a polygraph at his own expense (and passed with 99.2 % certainty)?
• Or the public official who turned bright red and speechless when asked at a Council Meeting to take one?

Obviously Leighton could clear his name quickly if he submitted to the test. Reserach has shown me that in some cases a polygraph is admissible in court – but for now... we aren’t in criminal court! Most of us have seen in “reality television” polygraphs given to “clear” suspects in murder and child abduction cases. The polygraph was so accurate for me that I promise you, if Leighton passed this test on the important issues I raise, I would “drop everything” and offer my most sincerest apology to him. Certainly if Leighton were innocent he would “jump at the chance” to clear his name in the court of “public opinion” (where he is elected).

I took a polygraph test in June of 2011 after being severely mistreated by the police (Dessoye’s police) on June 1 when my car was towed. The behavior of the police was so unfairly biased towards LAG towing that this became the pivot point (and the start) of my investigation. Knowing that people act consistently, I saw so much alarming behavior from the cops that this alone provided the impetus for my inquiry. I knew there had to be much more than “met the eye.” Boy was I right. I took the polygraph to enhance my credibility. I can tell you it has worked splendidly since not one cop has come forward and challenged my account of the events.

The polygraph test cost me $650. I passed with an average certainty rating of 99.2 % on the following four questions.

A)   When you called Wilkes-Barre 911 on June 1^st, did you report Leo Glodzik's threatening behavior?

Answer "Yes"          RESULT: NO DECEPTION INDICATED (2.4%)

===============================================================================

B) On June 1, did a Wilkes-Barre police officer say to you "l don't give a fuck about your car”?  

Answer "Yes"          RESULT: NO DECEPTION INDICATED (0.6%)

===============================================================================

C)   On June 1st, when Wilkes-Barre police arrived on the scene after you called them, did officers speak to Leo Glodzik first before speaking with you? (3 separate instances... Leo Glodzik gets "extra special attention" from police... even in the face of a 911 call made against him.)  Do you normally speak to the aggressor first in a 911 call?… and then next to the person who made the call? THREE TIMES OVER? Do you consider this normal police work?

Answer "Yes"          RESULT: NO DECEPTION INDICATED (0.1%)

===============================================================================

D) On June 1, did Leo Glodzik suggest that you lie to AAA by telling them your car had overheated? (This was part of Leo’s “fraud proposition” to me where he advised me to lie to AAA to get the $200 back... see Section IV on web site)

Answer "Yes"          RESULT: NO DECEPTION INDICATED (0.1%)

===============================================================================